![]() That means the image files themselves-the JPEGs, TIFFs and RAW files you’ve imported-live unblemished wherever you’ve downloaded them on your hard drive, but any edits you may make to those image files via Lightroom aren’t directly applied to the original files. What the catalog does contain is ancillary data about a given image file. Some users incorrectly believe the catalog file itself contains all of their image files, but it doesn’t. Lightroom creates a catalog file to store image metadata and editing information. And technically, it doesn’t require users to work with other Adobe apps. Adobe requires users to log in to use it, but downloading and using Bridge is free of charge. Bridge, on the other hand, is a standalone and totally free digital asset management application. These licensing plans mean photographers can get both Lightroom and Photoshop together but also offer the option to get just Lightroom for the select few who may not be interested in Photoshop. Either way, while some photographers bristle at the subscription model of licensing, $10 per month strikes me as quite reasonable for access to the pinnacle of world-class image editing. (For the purposes of this discussion, I’m focusing on the traditional version of the application for the desktop, known as Lightroom Classic.) Lightroom can be licensed from Adobe for as little as $10 per month-accompanied by either 1 TB of cloud storage or in conjunction with 20 GB of storage and a license of Adobe Photoshop as well. Lightroom is a standalone product with versions available for the desktop and mobile devices. So, in an effort to paint a fuller picture of the most useful applications for photographers, here’s a look at whether you should use Bridge or Lightroom, how they’re similar and where they differ. ![]() It served as a reminder for me that while Adobe certainly emphasizes Lightroom as one of its two primary photo-specific applications, there’s a lot to love about Bridge. For each point I made about Adobe Lightroom, the photographer countered with a reason why Bridge was just as good if not better. ![]() If, like Pye Jirsa and I, you regularly conduct shoots with anywhere from hundreds to thousands of images each time, you're most likely going to want to stick to Classic.I recently had a discussion with a photographer who bristled when I neglected to consider Adobe Bridge in a discussion about useful digital imaging tools. However, if you tend to work in smaller batches, Lightroom offers remote access to your images automatically, as well as backups, and a few other useful tools. That is, if you have huge volumes of work - as I do - Lightroom will likely not be the best option for you. Whereas Lightroom is primarily aimed at being cloud-based. The primary difference is that Lightroom Classic works as it always has with regards to the catalog of your images: it's locally stored. The difference between the two clients is both profound and minimal depending on what you're looking at. And that's actually what I did, but for better reasons. I wanted to "nope" straight out of the new client and go back to the version I could use in my sleep. I generally embrace change, but when it pulls the rug out from under my workflow, things get messier. ![]() When I first opened the shiny new Lightroom some years back, I immediately balked at the change.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |